|
This article may be reprinted free of charge provided 1) that there is clear attribution to the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, and 2) that both the OMNS free subscription link http://orthomolecular.org/subscribe.html and also the OMNS archive link http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/index.shtml are included. |
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Unveiling the Corporate Agenda Behind the Global Plant-Based Food MovementRichard Z. Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.The perception of plant-based foods as superior is largely shaped by corporate marketing rather than balanced evidence. This paper examines the role of industry influence, safety concerns related to plant-based foods, and the evolutionary context of human diets, challenging the widely promoted narrative that plant-based diets are inherently healthier or more sustainable. It calls for rigorous scrutiny of the plant-based narrative to ensure informed and balanced consumer choices in a landscape increasingly dominated by corporate interests. 1. Corporate Influence and Public Perception: The Bias Favoring Plant-Based Diets1.1 The Corporate Drive Behind the Plant-Based IndustryFood industry giants such as Nestlé, Unilever, and PepsiCo have aggressively acquired or developed plant-based brands, channeling substantial resources into advertising and product innovation to position themselves at the forefront of this market. These corporations have shaped public perception through extensive marketing, promoting plant-based foods as a superior choice over animal products and cementing their influence on global food trends. In recent decades, major corporations have propelled the global shift toward plant-based products, heavily investing in plant-based alternatives to capture emerging market opportunities. Companies in agribusiness, biotech, and food production sectors, such as Nestlé, Unilever, and PepsiCo, have strategically driven the plant-based trend by leveraging their power to portray plant-based foods as superior options and using their resources to position them as inherently 'healthy,' 'sustainable,' and 'ethical' choices. Through substantial investment and targeted marketing, these corporations have significantly influenced consumer perceptions and global food trends, promoting plant-based products as superior options in the marketplace(1–4). Companies like Nestlé, Unilever, and PepsiCo have strategically invested in plant-based alternatives, positioning them as healthy, sustainable, and ethical choices(3,4). These corporations have employed various strategies to maintain their influence, including regulatory capture, relationship building with stakeholders, and market-based approaches(5). The food industry has capitalized on nutritionism to enhance its power in global markets(2) and has embraced digital technologies to improve food system outcomes(6). While plant-based alternatives are often presented as resistance to corporate agri-food systems, they may actually reinforce corporate dominance(7). This corporate influence extends to global food governance, raising concerns about transparency and accountability(8). 1.2 Marketing Campaigns and Sponsored ResearchMarketing Campaigns and Health Claims: Through extensive marketing campaigns, corporations have reinforced a narrative that plant-based foods are inherently healthier and more environmentally friendly than meat-based foods. A recent study published in Business Strategy and the Environment analyzed over 16,000 marketing and labeling content observations from major US e-commerce grocery retailers(9). It found that plant-based foods (PBFs) were more robustly marketed than animal-sourced foods (ASFs), with an average of 47 claims per product compared to 28 for ASFs. PBFs tended to emphasize sustainability and health benefits, catering to consumer values around environmental stewardship and personal wellness(9,10). In addition to advertising, many companies sponsor studies and partner with research institutions to generate findings that support plant-based diets, sometimes funding selectively published research that favors their products. Research suggests that industry sponsorship of nutrition studies may bias results and conclusions in favor of sponsors' interests. Industry-funded studies are more likely to report favorable outcomes for sponsors' products(11–13) and interpret neutral results positively(14). Sponsored research often focuses on topics that benefit industry, such as physical activity rather than processed foods(15). While some analyses found no significant difference in conclusions between industry and non-industry studies(16), others identified clear bias(17). Industry funding can influence study design, conduct, and publication(18). Historically, food companies have deliberately manipulated research to support their products and minimize perceived harms(17). Though sponsored studies may not differ in methodological quality, they tend to have conclusions favoring sponsors that are sometimes unsupported by the data(13,14). This narrative is further amplified by partnerships with influencers and celebrities, who promote plant-based eating as a trendy lifestyle choice. The corporate influence over research, advertising, and public discourse has contributed to a widespread belief that plant-based foods are superior to meat, often without a balanced view of the evidence. 2. Safety Concerns with Plant-Based Foods: Natural Toxins and Man-Made Pollutants2.1 Naturally Occurring Toxins in PlantsPlant-based foods offer essential nutrients but also contain natural toxins, which evolved as protective mechanisms against predators. Examples include lectins, oxalates, phytic acid, glycoalkaloids, pyrrolizidine alkaloids, cyanogenic glycosides, and solanine(19–23). Lectins, found in legumes and grains, can interfere with nutrient absorption and damage the gut lining(24). Oxalates, present in foods like spinach and nuts, may contribute to kidney stones and hinder calcium absorption(24), while phytic acid binds essential minerals, reducing their bioavailability(25). Other concerning toxins include pyrrolizidine alkaloids, cyanogenic glycosides, and solanine(22). Gluten, found in wheat, barley, rye, spelt, and triticale, is traditionally not classified as a toxin but may act as one in certain contexts. Its component gliadin can increase intestinal permeability by triggering zonulin release, disrupting tight junctions between intestinal cells, and potentially causing inflammation and autoimmune responses in susceptible individuals(26–30). While measures can reduce the harmful health impacts of natural toxins in plant-based foods, the assumption that they are inherently safer or superior to meat-based foods is both unfounded and potentially harmful. 2.2 Pesticide Residues and Environmental ContaminantsBeyond natural toxins, plant-based foods are often exposed to man-made pollutants, particularly pesticides. Conventional farming relies heavily on pesticides and herbicides to maintain high crop yields. These chemicals leave residues on plant foods, many of which persist even after washing and cooking. Commonly used pesticides, such as glyphosate, have been linked to health risks including endocrine disruption, reproductive issues, and even cancer(31–37). In addition, industrial crops like soy and corn are frequently genetically modified to withstand high levels of pesticide application, resulting in higher residue levels in processed plant-based foods(38–41). Pesticide residues in plant-based foods pose significant health risks, including cancer, endocrine disruption, and reproductive issues(42,43). Conventional farming practices result in higher pesticide residues compared to organic methods(41,44). Glyphosate, a widely used herbicide, accumulates in genetically modified crops and is classified as a probable human carcinogen(42,44–46). The combined effects of multiple residues, additives, and natural toxins in food may have additive or synergistic effects, necessitating a comprehensive risk assessment approach(47). Pesticide contamination is prevalent in fruits and vegetables, with up to 97% of items containing residues and 42% posing dietary risks(48). Mitigation strategies include reducing or avoiding certain plant-based foods, prioritizing organic produce, employing proper food processing techniques, and considering nutraceutical interventions(41,43,49). The presence of these toxins challenges the notion that plant-based foods are inherently safer than meat-based foods. By promoting plant-based diets as safer or healthier without addressing these concerns, the public narrative may mislead consumers regarding the true risks associated with plant-based foods. 3. Evolutionary Context: Meat as the Foundation of Human Diets3.1 The Pre-Agricultural Diet of Early HumansHuman dietary habits evolved over millions of years, with early humans relying heavily on animal-based foods long before the advent of agriculture(50,51). Anthropological evidence shows that pre-agricultural diets were rich in animal protein, fat, and nutrients derived from meat, organs, and bone marrow(52–55). These high-calorie, nutrient-dense foods supported the energy demands of larger brain development in Homo species and shaped human physiology(56–60). The transition to agriculture around 10,000 years ago marked a significant dietary shift, introducing grains and legumes as staples. While this plant-based diet allowed for population growth and societal advancements, it reduced nutritional diversity and led to deficiencies, creating a mismatch between ancient biology and modern dietary patterns(61,62). The agricultural revolution fundamentally altered key nutritional aspects of ancestral diets, creating a mismatch between our ancient genome and the modern environment, which has likely contributed to the global rise of chronic diseases, particularly in Western societies(62–64). Although plant-based diets are often promoted for health benefits, evolutionary adaptations, such as poor taurine synthesis and limited ability to elongate plant-derived fatty acids, highlight a biological dependence on animal-source foods(50,65,66). Some critics of the agricultural transition contend it may have been a 'mistake' in human history, arguing that the relatively recent adoption of plant-heavy diets challenges our evolutionary legacy and contributes to unintended health consequences, such as reduced nutrient density in modern diets(67,68). ConclusionThe modern narrative favoring plant-based diets over meat-based ones is significantly shaped by corporate interests, with extensive marketing campaigns and industry-sponsored research influencing public perception. Despite claims of inherent health and safety benefits, plant-based foods contain naturally occurring toxins and are often exposed to pollutants like pesticides. An evolutionary perspective further suggests that humans are either designed for or naturally adapted to diets rich in animal-based foods; a plant-dominant diet may thus conflict with the dietary patterns that supported human development over millions of years. While plant-based foods may contribute to a balanced diet, consumers should remain mindful of the corporate influence, potential health risks, and nutritional limitations associated with exclusively plant-based diets. A balanced approach, incorporating whole, minimally processed plant and animal foods may better support human health and align with evolutionary biology. For both healthcare professionals and consumers, it is crucial to critically assess all sources of dietary information, acknowledging that even trusted institutions, including regulatory agencies and medical schools, can be swayed by external interests. Ultimately, a holistic and evidence-based approach to nutrition, free from undue corporate influence, will better align with both evolutionary principles and modern health needs. Future Outlook: Implications Under New LeadershipWith President Trump beginning his second term and RFK Jr. nominated as Secretary of Health and Human Services, significant policy shifts regarding the plant-based food movement may be on the horizon. Both leaders have expressed skepticism of corporate overreach and have voiced a commitment to restoring transparency in public health and nutrition policies. The Trump administration’s focus on deregulation and market-driven solutions could lead to a reevaluation of subsidies and incentives that disproportionately benefit the plant-based food industry, potentially challenging the dominance of large corporations in this sector. Moreover, there may be an increased emphasis on traditional diets and dietary freedom, aligning food policy more closely with individual choice rather than corporate or ideological influence. RFK Jr., as HHS Secretary, is likely to prioritize public health initiatives centered on transparency, accountability, and evidence-based practices. His longstanding environmental advocacy may also influence stricter oversight of the environmental claims made by plant-based food manufacturers, ensuring that sustainability narratives are backed by robust scientific analysis. Additionally, his focus on minimizing corporate influence in public health could foster a more balanced debate about the benefits and risks of plant-based versus animal-based diets. His appointment offers a unique opportunity to prioritize evidence-based policies that are less susceptible to corporate lobbying and more aligned with public health priorities. These changes present an opportunity to reshape the public discourse on nutrition, moving toward a more holistic and individualized understanding of health and diet. By addressing the corporate-driven narratives surrounding plant-based diets, the new administration could empower consumers with clearer, more balanced information to make informed dietary choices. This shift in leadership offers a chance to revisit the role of corporate narratives in shaping dietary patterns, potentially paving the way for a more equitable and transparent food system. References:1. Aschemann-Witzel J, Gantriis RF, Fraga P, Perez-Cueto FJA. Plant-based food and protein trend from a business perspective: markets, consumers, and the challenges and opportunities in the future. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61(18):3119–28. 2. Clapp J, Scrinis G. Big Food, Nutritionism, and Corporate Power: Globalizations: Vol 14 , No 4 - Get Access. Globalizations. 2016 Oct 25;14(4):578–95. 3. Slater S, Lawrence M, Wood B, Serodio P, Baker P. Corporate interest groups and their implications for global food governance: mapping and analysing the global corporate influence network of the transnational ultra-processed food industry. Glob Health. 2024 Feb 22;20(1):16. 4. Scrinis G. CRFA - Big Food corporations and the nutritional marketing and regulation of processed foods. Can Food Stud Rev Can Études Sur Aliment. 2015 Sep 8;2(2):136–45. 5. Lacy-Nichols J, Williams O. "Part of the Solution:" Food Corporation Strategies for Regulatory Capture and Legitimacy. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(Special Issue on Political Economy of Food Systems):845–56. 6. Hassoun A, Boukid F, Pasqualone A, Bryant CJ, García GG, Parra-López C, et al. Emerging trends in the agri-food sector: Digitalisation and shift to plant-based diets. Curr Res Food Sci. 2022;5:2261–9. 7. Bonanno A. Resistance to corporate agri-food. The case of plant-based meat. Estud Sociol. 2020 Aug 21;1(26):235–66. 8. Clapp J, Fuchs D. Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance [Internet]. MIT Press Scholarship Online; 2009. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/14213 9. Gerber S, Dix SR, Cash SB. Marketing plant-based versus animal-sourced foods in online grocery stores: A comparative content analysis of sustainability and other product claims in the United States. Bus Strategy Environ. 2024;33(5):4958–73. 10. Vegconomist. New Study Reveals Key Marketing Differences Between Plant-Based and Animal-Sourced Foods Online - vegconomist - the vegan business magazine [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 13]. Available from: https://vegconomist.com/market-and-trends/new-study-reveals-marketing-differences-between-plant-based-animal-sourced-foods-online/ 11. Lesser LI, Ebbeling CB, Goozner M, Wypij D, Ludwig DS. Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS Med. 2007 Jan;4(1):e5. 12. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1167–70. 13. Lundh A, Sismondo S, Lexchin J, Busuioc OA, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:MR000033. 14. Nestle M. Food Politics by Marion Nestle. 2016 [cited 2024 Nov 13]. More on corporate funding of nutrition research: exchange of letters. Available from: https://www.foodpolitics.com/2016/05/more-on-corporate-funding-of-nutrition-research-exchange-of-letters/ 15.Fabbri A, Holland TJ, Bero LA. Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21(18):3422–30. 16. Chartres N, Fabbri A, Bero LA. Association of Industry Sponsorship With Outcomes of Nutrition Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1769–77. 17. Nestle M. Food Industry Funding of Nutrition Research: The Relevance of History for Current Debates. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;176(11):1685–6. 18. Fabbri A. Using research sponsorship to skew the evidence base towards policies and interventions that favour industry. Eur J Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;30(Supplement_5):ckaa165.504. 19. Patel S, Nag M, Daharwal S, Singh M, Singh D. Plant Toxins: An Overview. Res J Pharmacol Pharmacodyn. 2013 Sep 1;5:283–8. 20. Hajšlová J, Schulzová V, Botek P, Lojza J. Natural toxins in food crops and their changes during processing. Czech J Food Sci. 2004 Jan 1;22(SI-Chem. Reactions in Foods V):S29–34. 21. Urugo MM, Tringo TT. Naturally Occurring Plant Food Toxicants and the Role of Food Processing Methods in Their Detoxification. Int J Food Sci. 2023;2023:9947841. 22. Rietjens IMCM, Martena MJ, Boersma MG, Spiegelenberg W, Alink GM. Molecular mechanisms of toxicity of important food-borne phytotoxins. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2005 Feb;49(2):131–58. 23. Akande KE, Doma UD, Agu HO, Adamu HM. Major Antinutrients Found in Plant Protein Sources: Their Effect on Nutrition. Pak J Nutr. 2010;9(8):827–32. 24. Norton SK. Lost Seasonality and Overconsumption of Plants: Risking Oxalate Toxicity. J Evol Health Jt Publ Ancestral Health Soc Soc Evol Med Health [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Nov 13];2(3). Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8mv397xz 25. Urogo MM, Tringo TT. [PDF] Naturally Occurring Plant Food Toxicants and the Role of Food Processing Methods in Their Detoxification | Semantic Scholar. Int J Food Sci Nutr [Internet]. 2023 Apr 27 [cited 2024 Nov 13];2023. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/reader/40e3dfa69372cdc56845358481ddb4a694746019 26. Fasano A. Zonulin and its regulation of intestinal barrier function: the biological door to inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Physiol Rev. 2011 Jan;91(1):151–75. 27. Obrenovich MEM. Leaky Gut, Leaky Brain? Microorganisms. 2018 Dec;6(4):107. 28. Araújo EA, Pinto AC, Cavalcante DEC, Cabral FM, Santos JM, Costa KV. Permeable gut syndrome, gluten, and autoimmune disease: an integrative review. Int J Nutrology [Internet]. 2021 Nov 5 [cited 2024 Nov 17];14(3). Available from: https://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/4 29. Valitutti F, Fasano A. Breaking Down Barriers: How Understanding Celiac Disease Pathogenesis Informed the Development of Novel Treatments. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jul;64(7):1748–58. 30. Hollon J, Puppa EL, Greenwald B, Goldberg E, Guerrerio A, Fasano A. Effect of gliadin on permeability of intestinal biopsy explants from celiac disease patients and patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Nutrients. 2015 Feb 27;7(3):1565–76. 31. Samsel A, Seneff S. Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases II: Celiac sprue and gluten intolerance. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2013 Dec;6(4):159–84. 32. Seneff S, Morley WA, Hadden MJ, Michener MC. Does Glyphosate Acting as a Glycine Analogue Contribute To ALS? Seneff [Internet]. 2016 Nov [cited 2024 Feb 4]; Available from: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/109267 33. Tajai P, Pruksakorn D, Chattipakorn SC, Chattipakorn N, Shinlapawittayatorn K. Effects of glyphosate-based herbicides and glyphosate exposure on sex hormones and the reproductive system: From epidemiological evidence to mechanistic insights. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Sep;102:104252. 34. Milesi MM, Lorenz V, Durando M, Rossetti MF, Varayoud J. Glyphosate Herbicide: Reproductive Outcomes and Multigenerational Effects. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:672532. 35. Prasad M, Rekha UV, Rajagopal P, Sekar D, Jayaraman S. A Review on Impact of Glyphosate on Development of Cancer. J Pharm Res Int. 2021 Dec 28;307–16. 36. Ingaramo P, Alarcón R, Muñoz-de-Toro M, Luque EH. Are glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides endocrine disruptors that alter female fertility? Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020 Dec 1;518:110934. 37. Mesnage R, Defarge N, Spiroux de Vendômois J, Séralini GE. Potential toxic effects of glyphosate and its commercial formulations below regulatory limits. Food Chem Toxicol Int J Publ Br Ind Biol Res Assoc. 2015 Oct;84:133–53. 38. Coupe RH, Capel PD. Trends in pesticide use on soybean, corn and cotton since the introduction of major genetically modified crops in the United States. Pest Manag Sci. 2016 May;72(5):1013–22. 39. Daniell H. Genetically Modified Food Crops: Current Concerns and Solutions for Next Generation Crops. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2000 Aug;17(1):327–52. 40. Sönmezoglu ÖA, Keskin H. Determination of genetically modified corn and soy in processed food products. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2015 Jun 20;3(3):032–7. 41. Neme K, Satheesh N. Review on Pesticide Residue in Plant Food Products: Health Impacts and Mechanisms to Reduce the Residue Levels in Food. Arch Appl Sci Res. 2016 Sep 1;2016:55–60. 42. Myers JP, Antoniou MN, Blumberg B, Carroll L, Colborn T, Everett LG, et al. Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement. Environ Health. 2016 Feb 17;15(1):19. 43. Cohen M. Environmental toxins and health--the health impact of pesticides. Aust Fam Physician. 2007 Dec;36(12):1002–4. 44. Bøhn T, Cuhra M, Traavik T, Sanden M, Fagan J, Primicerio R. Compositional differences in soybeans on the market: glyphosate accumulates in Roundup Ready GM soybeans. Food Chem. 2014 Jun 15;153:207–15. 45. Ojelade BS, Durowoju OS, Adesoye PO, Gibb SW, Ekosse GI. Review of Glyphosate-Based Herbicide and Aminomethylphosphonic Acid (AMPA): Environmental and Health Impacts. Appl Sci. 2022 Jan;12(17):8789. 46. Caiati C, Pollice P, Favale S, Lepera ME. The Herbicide Glyphosate and Its Apparently Controversial Effect on Human Health: An Updated Clinical Perspective. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2020;20(4):489–505. 47. Shaw IC. Chemical residues, food additives and natural toxicants in food – the cocktail effect - Shaw - 2014 - International Journal of Food Science & Technology - Wiley Online Library. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2014 Oct;49(10):2149–57. 48. Wyckhuys KAG, Aebi A, Bijleveld van Lexmond MFIJ, Bojaca CR, Bonmatin JM, Furlan L, et al. Resolving the twin human and environmental health hazards of a plant-based diet. Environ Int. 2020 Nov;144:106081. 49. Sajad M, Shabir S, Singh SK, Bhardwaj R, Alsanie WF, Alamri AS, et al. Role of nutraceutical against exposure to pesticide residues: power of bioactive compounds. Front Nutr. 2024;11:1342881. 50. Mann N. Meat in the human diet: An anthropological perspective - MANN - 2007 - Nutrition & Dietetics - Wiley Online Library. 2007 Aug 15;64(s4):S99–195. 51.Milton K. The critical role played by animal source foods in human (Homo) evolution. J Nutr. 2003 Nov;133(11 Suppl 2):3886S-3892S. 52. Noakes MBChB M DSc, PhD (hc), FACSM, (hon) FFSEM (UK), Emeritus Professor,Td. The 2012 University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences centenary debate: "Cholesterol is not an important risk factor for heart disease, and the current dietary recommendations do more harm than good." South Afr J Clin Nutr. 2015 Jan 1;28(1):19–33. 53. Cordain L, Miller JB, Eaton SB, Mann N, Holt SH, Speth JD. Plant-animal subsistence ratios and macronutrient energy estimations in worldwide hunter-gatherer diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Mar;71(3):682–92. 54. Ben-Dor M, Sirtoli R, Barkai R. The evolution of the human trophic level during the Pleistocene. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Aug;175 Suppl 72:27–56. 55. Mummert A, Esche E, Robinson J, Armelagos GJ. Stature and robusticity during the agricultural transition: Evidence from the bioarchaeological record. Econ Hum Biol. 2011 Jul 1;9(3):284–301. 56. Leonard WR, Robertson ML. Evolutionary perspectives on human nutrition: The influence of brain and body size on diet and metabolism. Am J Hum Biol Off J Hum Biol Counc. 1994;6(1):77–88. 57. Leonard WR, Snodgrass JJ, Robertson ML. Effects of brain evolution on human nutrition and metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2007;27:311–27. 58. Braun DR, Harris JWK, Levin NE, McCoy JT, Herries AIR, Bamford MK, et al. Early hominin diet included diverse terrestrial and aquatic animals 1.95 Ma in East Turkana, Kenya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 1;107(22):10002–7. 59. Mann NJ. A brief history of meat in the human diet and current health implications. Meat Sci. 2018 Oct;144:169–79. 60. Gorbunova NA. Assessing the role of meat consumption in human evolutionary changes. A review. Theory Pract Meat Process. 2024 Apr 2;9(1):53–64. 61. Larsen CS. Animal source foods and human health during evolution. J Nutr. 2003 Nov;133(11 Suppl 2):3893S-3897S. 62. Cordain L, Eaton SB, Sebastian A, Mann N, Lindeberg S, Watkins BA, et al. Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st century. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Feb;81(2):341–54. 63. Kopp W. Significant Dietary Changes during Human Evolution and the Development of Cancer: From Cells in Trouble to Cells Causing Trouble. J Carcinog Mutagen [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Nov 17];08(04). Available from: https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/significant-dietary-changes-during-human-evolution-and-the-development-of-cancer-from-cells-in-trouble-to-cells-causing-trouble-2157-2518-1000303.php?aid=92161 64. Ruiz-Núñez B, Pruimboom L, Dijck-Brouwer DAJ, Muskiet FAJ. Lifestyle and nutritional imbalances associated with Western diseases: causes and consequences of chronic systemic low-grade inflammation in an evolutionary context. J Nutr Biochem. 2013 Jul;24(7):1183–201. 65. Tso R, Forde CG. Unintended Consequences: Nutritional Impact and Potential Pitfalls of Switching from Animal- to Plant-Based Foods. Nutrients. 2021 Aug;13(8):2527. 66.Leroy F, Barnard ND. Children and adults should avoid consuming animal products to reduce risk for chronic disease: NO. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Oct 1;112(4):931–6. 67. Diamond J. The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race | Discover Magazine. Discover [Internet]. 1999 May 1 [cited 2024 Nov 13]; Available from: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/the-worst-mistake-in-the-history-of-the-human-race 68. Blackwell MSA, Takahashi T, Cardenas LM, Collins AL, Enriquez-Hidalgo D, Griffith BA, et al. Potential unintended consequences of agricultural land use change driven by dietary transitions. Npj Sustain Agric. 2024 Jan 10;2(1):1. Nutritional Medicine is Orthomolecular MedicineOrthomolecular medicine uses safe, effective nutritional therapy to fight illness. For more information: http://www.orthomolecular.org Find a DoctorTo locate an orthomolecular physician near you: http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v06n09.shtml The peer-reviewed Orthomolecular Medicine News Service is a non-profit and non-commercial informational resource. Editorial Review Board:
Albert G. B. Amoa, MB.Ch.B, Ph.D. (Ghana)
Comments and media contact: editor@orthomolecular.org OMNS welcomes but is unable to respond to individual reader emails. Reader comments become the property of OMNS and may or may not be used for publication. Click here to see a web copy of this news release: https://orthomolecular.acemlna.com/p_v.php?l=1&c=337&m=339&s=bad97c655476f96a390a72c05a742011 |
|
|
This news release was sent to _t.e.s.t_@example.com. If you no longer wish to receive news releases, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link: unsubscribe . To update your profile settings click here . This article may be reprinted free of charge provided 1) that there is clear attribution to the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, and 2) that both the OMNS free subscription link http://orthomolecular.org/subscribe.html and also the OMNS archive link http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/index.shtml are included.
|
|
